Yep. That's right. That's you. You were arguing that infections were not significant in the Floyd riots because they were wearing masks, which I've demonstrated were useless and had a negative impact, and then you've tried to argue they were effective because N95s were effective in clinical studies in closed environments, but none of the people in the riots were wearing N95s. So you're trying to argue something completely unrelated that had no impact and no relation to the subject at hand whatsoever.
Yep. That's right. That's you. You were arguing that infections were not significant in the Floyd riots because they were wearing masks, which I've demonstrated were useless and had a negative impact, and then you've tried to argue they were effective because N95s were effective in clinical studies in closed environments, but none of the people in the riots were wearing N95s. So you're trying to argue something completely unrelated that had no impact and no relation to the subject at hand whatsoever.
That is exactly what happened, you are the wrong -and illeterate- one here.