I saw a lot of counternarrative posts recently on Twitter about Auschwitz having a swimming pool/movie theater/arts theater/maternity ward/orchestra, library etc.
For heterodox people pushing that the camps weren't as bad as history tells us, what is their ultimate position?
That less died than reported?
That industrial scale extermination didn't happen at all?
Jewish cultural legacy is one of entitlement, subversion, and grievance. Its not a criticism. Same way that the American soul is one of humiliation and spite, it just is.
The Holocaust was a white culture recognizing the incompatibility of thay culture with its own, rejecting it, and what happened after.
Here's the critical piece. The narrative of Nazis is borderline mystical. They're suddenly for no reason at all arrival. Their magical instant mind control that dies with Hitler, their clockwork industrial perfection in efficiency and universal application of policy to rival mcdonalds in the fucking 40s.
What's the point? The Nazis rejected jews and wanted them gone. They attempted deportation which failed, they switched to concentration. Now what? Some were probably murdered by the camps staffed by people who hated them due to the above. Others starved because low priority people starve in war. And some were bombed by the Allies.
In the aftermath there is not SINGLE interested party who wants a nuanced conclusion. Europe wants somebody to blame, the Allies want a cover for their atrocities, the Jews want land and power. The Germans want to wash their hands as quickly as possible. Every single group has a vested interest in
Blaming Germany for everything
Germany having acted as evilly as possible.
The Nazis being both pure evil, and absolutely magnetic so the Germans can put it all behind them with minimal punishment.
These three goals directly incentivize maximizing the holocaust in terms of both intent and scale.
We end up with a Climate Change situation where the number has changed over and over to always make sure Jews juuuuust eek out to be the majority of casualties.
What's the point? The Nazis rejected jews and wanted them gone. They attempted deportation which failed, they switched to concentration. Now what? Some were probably murdered by the camps staffed by people who hated them due to the above. Others starved because low priority people starve in war. And some were bombed by the Allies.
So in this version, there's deaths in the camps from neglect and general wartime hardships, but no systematic gas chambers?
Is there still forced labor?
So in this narrative, Jews were literally being concentrated in areas but with no further plan while the war was still going other than segregation?
I'm asking these questions in good faith, trying to understand the more nuanced "Holocaust denier" labeled position.
I tried to find some of the "Auschwitz was full of amenities" posts on Twitter, but could only find this one. They may have been memoryholed.
Put a shorter way. The exact same people who maintain the Holocaust at maximum and make questioning it illegal are the ones who call fighting ages, male economic migrants "terrified refugees" and will hold an infant in smoke to get a good photo op.
I saw a lot of counternarrative posts recently on Twitter about Auschwitz having a swimming pool/movie theater/arts theater/maternity ward/orchestra, library etc.
For heterodox people pushing that the camps weren't as bad as history tells us, what is their ultimate position?
That less died than reported?
That industrial scale extermination didn't happen at all?
That these camps were simply holding facilities?
Jewish cultural legacy is one of entitlement, subversion, and grievance. Its not a criticism. Same way that the American soul is one of humiliation and spite, it just is.
The Holocaust was a white culture recognizing the incompatibility of thay culture with its own, rejecting it, and what happened after.
Here's the critical piece. The narrative of Nazis is borderline mystical. They're suddenly for no reason at all arrival. Their magical instant mind control that dies with Hitler, their clockwork industrial perfection in efficiency and universal application of policy to rival mcdonalds in the fucking 40s.
What's the point? The Nazis rejected jews and wanted them gone. They attempted deportation which failed, they switched to concentration. Now what? Some were probably murdered by the camps staffed by people who hated them due to the above. Others starved because low priority people starve in war. And some were bombed by the Allies.
In the aftermath there is not SINGLE interested party who wants a nuanced conclusion. Europe wants somebody to blame, the Allies want a cover for their atrocities, the Jews want land and power. The Germans want to wash their hands as quickly as possible. Every single group has a vested interest in
Blaming Germany for everything
Germany having acted as evilly as possible.
The Nazis being both pure evil, and absolutely magnetic so the Germans can put it all behind them with minimal punishment.
These three goals directly incentivize maximizing the holocaust in terms of both intent and scale.
We end up with a Climate Change situation where the number has changed over and over to always make sure Jews juuuuust eek out to be the majority of casualties.
Watch American Krogan's pieces on Biosbock.
So in this version, there's deaths in the camps from neglect and general wartime hardships, but no systematic gas chambers?
Is there still forced labor?
So in this narrative, Jews were literally being concentrated in areas but with no further plan while the war was still going other than segregation?
I'm asking these questions in good faith, trying to understand the more nuanced "Holocaust denier" labeled position.
I tried to find some of the "Auschwitz was full of amenities" posts on Twitter, but could only find this one. They may have been memoryholed.
https://twitter.com/MarkFletcherOAC/status/1749558608872771742#m
Put a shorter way. The exact same people who maintain the Holocaust at maximum and make questioning it illegal are the ones who call fighting ages, male economic migrants "terrified refugees" and will hold an infant in smoke to get a good photo op.