Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

34
Someone asked recently what kind of weapon works well in space. This kind. (www.defensenews.com)
posted 1 year ago by Kaarous 1 year ago by Kaarous +34 / -0
In first, UK downs aerial drone with test shot from DragonFire laser
The trial with the direct-energy weapon is considered a significant milestone toward the deployment of the system, possibly within five years.
www.defensenews.com
46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Kaarous [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

If I consider it, the biggest factors in space combat will be detection. Seeing the other guy first before he sees you. Unless someone invents magic and energy shields actually exist, attaining parity between defense and offense is likely impossible and thus it becomes something akin to submarine warfare.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BandageBandolier 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I'd see detection as the biggest determinant too. But if directed energy weapons are the choice you have the interesting situation where they don't necessarily do catastrophic damage instantaneously, and you're providing a giant beacon to return fire at, so I wouldn't discount defence entirely. Maybe even a simple reactive defence of explosively launched optical chaff, deployed fast enough, could buy a fraction of a second to return fire and turm an engagement into a mutual loss or a millisecond game of system targeting precision/luck.

Which is where missiles could potentially have a place. Assuming you have the detection initiative you could dumb launch one or many without necessarily giving away your position, then allow them to drift far away from yourself before igniting to mask your location.bThey would be incredibly vulnerable to directed energy weapon interception, but depending on the technical capabilities of the weapons, them firing on the missile(s) might provide the safe window to disable then with a directed energy weapon of your own without suffering immediate return fire.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Kaarous [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

In terms of defense I meant armor of some variety, not so much point defense or chaff. E-war can't really be discounted either, if they're blind they're dead.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BandageBandolier 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

In this context I was envisioning the chaff not as a targeting disruptor like usual, but more a cloud of launched EM absorbing material functioning kinda like reactive armour on tanks. Even as it gets vaporised it's still matter instead of vacuum, choose the right elements and it can continue to absorb or deflect a significant portion of energy at the right wavelengths even as a plasma. With that it might be possible to bring down the the delta E that actually reaches the hull down to somewhere where appropriately reflective/conductive/resistant materials can maintain integrity for a fraction or a second or longer, enough for automated retaliation maybe.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - gfttc (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy