Well, to be clear, there were accusations of romantic entanglement. Made all that much odder by the fact that they were divorced. Actually, I think the most official version we have that has OJ guilty -- the prosecutor's theory -- is that OJ was jealous of his ex-wife's new bf. That is the only motive we have.
Despite what this juror says, I thought he didn't do it and there's more evidence he may have been covering for the one that did.
Basically this could be another Michael Jackson in that he was innocent but public opinion still finds him guilty.
His wife was cheating on him. He wrote a book, backhandedly admitting to it.
Sounds like justifiable homicide.
If it weren't premeditated.
I'm actually OK with that too. If "you cheat, you die" was a cultural norm maybe people would take marriage more seriously.
It's all philosophical of course; the legal system doesn't excuse killing your wife because she cockolded you, unfortunately.
I'm confused. I thought it was his ex-wife, and how could she be cheatin gon him?
I'm going by memory. I'm no O.J historian. So you probably know better than me.
Well, to be clear, there were accusations of romantic entanglement. Made all that much odder by the fact that they were divorced. Actually, I think the most official version we have that has OJ guilty -- the prosecutor's theory -- is that OJ was jealous of his ex-wife's new bf. That is the only motive we have.