A study at Swansea University found incels - or involuntary celibates - overestimated physical attractiveness and finances, while underestimating kindness, humour and loyalty. The study's co-author Andrew Thomas said "thinking errors" could "lead us down some quite troubling paths".
Don't believe your lying eyes, bigot. You're an incel because your "thinking errors" are allowing you to see what's right in front of your face, not because women are shallow whores who engage in precisely the mate selection behavior that you're seeing. Let's just ignore all the non-incels who say the exact same thing because that's inconvenient for the narrative. And don't you dare undermine women's AF/BB scam by living for yourself instead of simping. Someone needs to foot the bill for Tyrone Jr. and pint-sized Pookie, and it certainly won't be whore who birthed them or the deadbeats she let raw dog her.
"People are saying that the reason that incels struggle to find relationships and sex is because their standards are too high, and what we were able to demonstrate here is, compared to our group of men that weren't incel, actually their minimum mate preferences were a lot lower.
This is an "experts say grass is green" tier finding, but since "experts" are more likely to say that grass is purple these days I'll give them credit for not suppressing this finding. Still, it was obvious to everyone involved that the "incels are only going after supermodels" narrative is just women projecting their Chad chasing onto romantically unsuccessful men.
Reeeeing about Andrew Tate
This just shows that the "experts" have no fucking clue. Andrew Tate isn't an incel and actual incels hate him. They see him as a Chad, and they hate Chads just as much as they hate women. But sure, keep banging on about the fake rape and human trafficking charges against him because you're too retarded to realize that charging him for the scams he actually perpetrated would have done far more to discredit him than transparently using the exact same tactics that the regime uses to get rid of everyone it dislikes.
'overestimate' and 'underestimate' are also the ultimate weasel words, especially when it comes to statistical distribution.
If you think looks matter and personality is worthless(and, heh, newsflash, in alot of situation, that's spot fucking on!) and some social science soiboi comes up and goes 'well, um, ACKSHUALLY' and proceeds to spin out some bullshit of how 51% compared to 49% or some such nonsense is technically correct - but it's still a blatant lie, because we're talking social trends, not statistical.
And people wonder why we don't trust the 'experts' anymore.
'overestimate' and 'underestimate' are also the ultimate weasel words, especially when it comes to statistical distribution.
Yeah, I was going to point that out.
...incels...overestimated physical attractiveness and finances, while underestimating kindness, humour and loyalty...
That is almost certainly a factual statement...yet also misleading. Incels do overestimate and underestimate those things, absolutely. The important question is, who is closer to the truth, incels or Experts? If it's not the Experts, their statements are meaningless lies. If incels (or any other group) are more correct than the Experts (usually the case nowadays), the Experts don't get to whine about the other group not being one hundred percent on the money.
Don't believe your lying eyes, bigot. You're an incel because your "thinking errors" are allowing you to see what's right in front of your face, not because women are shallow whores who engage in precisely the mate selection behavior that you're seeing. Let's just ignore all the non-incels who say the exact same thing because that's inconvenient for the narrative. And don't you dare undermine women's AF/BB scam by living for yourself instead of simping. Someone needs to foot the bill for Tyrone Jr. and pint-sized Pookie, and it certainly won't be whore who birthed them or the deadbeats she let raw dog her.
This is an "experts say grass is green" tier finding, but since "experts" are more likely to say that grass is purple these days I'll give them credit for not suppressing this finding. Still, it was obvious to everyone involved that the "incels are only going after supermodels" narrative is just women projecting their Chad chasing onto romantically unsuccessful men.
This just shows that the "experts" have no fucking clue. Andrew Tate isn't an incel and actual incels hate him. They see him as a Chad, and they hate Chads just as much as they hate women. But sure, keep banging on about the fake rape and human trafficking charges against him because you're too retarded to realize that charging him for the scams he actually perpetrated would have done far more to discredit him than transparently using the exact same tactics that the regime uses to get rid of everyone it dislikes.
'overestimate' and 'underestimate' are also the ultimate weasel words, especially when it comes to statistical distribution.
If you think looks matter and personality is worthless(and, heh, newsflash, in alot of situation, that's spot fucking on!) and some social science soiboi comes up and goes 'well, um, ACKSHUALLY' and proceeds to spin out some bullshit of how 51% compared to 49% or some such nonsense is technically correct - but it's still a blatant lie, because we're talking social trends, not statistical.
And people wonder why we don't trust the 'experts' anymore.
Yeah, I was going to point that out.
That is almost certainly a factual statement...yet also misleading. Incels do overestimate and underestimate those things, absolutely. The important question is, who is closer to the truth, incels or Experts? If it's not the Experts, their statements are meaningless lies. If incels (or any other group) are more correct than the Experts (usually the case nowadays), the Experts don't get to whine about the other group not being one hundred percent on the money.