I also googled it, and it sure looks like she's incorrectly repeating some random poster's comment from 2017 from some forum. I suspect she was scanning down the thread past all the other definitions of short approach until she got to "ATC chief told me one time", and that one short reference to an authority figure immediately cemented the following statement in the post as the official definition going forward for her. Whole argument gave me the vibes breadtube internet debate tactics, but she somehow managed to prop up her "I'm an expert" facade with something less credible than the opening paragraph of a wikipedia article.
The youtube video has a few comments from people who have had to deal with this chick flying into that specific airport too, general consensus being that she's an obnoxious Karen no one wants to deal with(not that it wasn't already obvious from the clip).
it's fascinating when you think about this. women are observedly and objectively more social creatures than men.
If you look at hobbies for instance, hobby spaces that are dominated by men tend to be about the activity itself, and groups around that hobby are formed for the purpose of having other people to share that hobby with, therefore having more ways to participate in the hobby. however, when the hobby space is dominated by women, it tends to be more about talking about the hobby and wearing the hobby as some sort of fashion statement so as to signal that you want to talk to other people about this hobby. female groups around a hobby tend to be about the group itself getting together and sharing stories, with the hobby being an excuse to get together.
applying this to the intellectual space, it's easy to see how men would be more interested in observed facts, whereas women would be more interested in consensus around said facts.
I also googled it, and it sure looks like she's incorrectly repeating some random poster's comment from 2017 from some forum. I suspect she was scanning down the thread past all the other definitions of short approach until she got to "ATC chief told me one time", and that one short reference to an authority figure immediately cemented the following statement in the post as the official definition going forward for her. Whole argument gave me the vibes breadtube internet debate tactics, but she somehow managed to prop up her "I'm an expert" facade with something less credible than the opening paragraph of a wikipedia article.
The youtube video has a few comments from people who have had to deal with this chick flying into that specific airport too, general consensus being that she's an obnoxious Karen no one wants to deal with(not that it wasn't already obvious from the clip).
Women are ruled by consensus
it's fascinating when you think about this. women are observedly and objectively more social creatures than men.
If you look at hobbies for instance, hobby spaces that are dominated by men tend to be about the activity itself, and groups around that hobby are formed for the purpose of having other people to share that hobby with, therefore having more ways to participate in the hobby. however, when the hobby space is dominated by women, it tends to be more about talking about the hobby and wearing the hobby as some sort of fashion statement so as to signal that you want to talk to other people about this hobby. female groups around a hobby tend to be about the group itself getting together and sharing stories, with the hobby being an excuse to get together.
applying this to the intellectual space, it's easy to see how men would be more interested in observed facts, whereas women would be more interested in consensus around said facts.
It's all natural from God. If we didn't deny these things of ourselves things would be much better.
Yes they work together well when everyone acknowledges the difference and goes their separate ways on this type of stuff.