The title clipped from the article is deceptive framing.
The bit about suppressing Rogan and Murray is literally the last two lines of the piece and is never mentioned previously except a passive reference that the Counter-Terrorism workshop played down Islamic threats and focused more on right-wing extremism.
The publication is openly pro-Israel.
The author, while I didn't do an early life check, is presumably a British young woman who openly complains about Oct 7th and gaslights that it's inconceivable that UK intelligence services are violating civil rights of everyday citizens because "there's too much red tape".
These are luxury attitudes. It is easy to be sat in Kings College London and feel that all cultures are equal, when you haven’t been anally raped at a peace festival by someone shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and held hostage. In the introduction to the course, labeling an organisation as terrorist was described as a problem because it ‘implies a moral judgment’. Nothing was said about why a moral judgment might be appropriate.
...
One attendee provocatively asked a former head of GCHQ whether he ‘felt bad infringing on our civil liberties in the pursuit of terrorists?’ Naïve and uninformed, the questioner had highlighted mainstream opinion that security services are routinely listening to innocent, random people’s phone calls or stalking their WhatsApps. Lacking was any appreciation the UK is exemplary. Protective legislation is laborious to the point of being near obstructive and investigations pursuing criminals and terrorists are rigorously audited.
TL;DR - Young British Jew-lover former civil servant woman thinks UK intelligence apparatus is "exemplary" and "doesn't infringe on the rights of everyday citizens because paperwork" but isn't cracking down on Muslims hard enough.
The title clipped from the article is deceptive framing.
The bit about suppressing Rogan and Murray is literally the last two lines of the piece and is never mentioned previously except a passive reference that the Counter-Terrorism workshop played down Islamic threats and focused more on right-wing extremism.
The publication is openly pro-Israel.
The author, while I didn't do an early life check, is presumably a British young woman who openly complains about Oct 7th and gaslights that it's inconceivable that UK intelligence services are violating civil rights of everyday citizens because "there's too much red tape".
...
TL;DR - Young British Jew-lover former civil servant woman thinks UK intelligence apparatus is "exemplary" and "doesn't infringe on the rights of everyday citizens because paperwork" but isn't cracking down on Muslims hard enough.