Why are states even in the business of primaries anyway?
The Democratic party is a private organization, and can choose its candidate using any method it wants. They have already said that if New Hampshire doesn't do what they want they will simply invalidate the results and take away their delegates, which is their right.
The sole purpose of a primary election is for the political parties to choose their candidate for the general election. Not a single dime of public money, and not a single moment of a government officials time should be spent on this endeavor. It's an entirely internal process to the political parties and they should pay for and administer it however they choose.
Being a “private” corporation doesn’t give the right to circumvent constitutional rights, not to mention their own written bylaws. Being a private corporation does not allow you to defraud. Being a private corporation does not allow you to abuse “freedom of association” especially when your functionally control all paths to power.
Your enemies don’t care about the rules. They care about your destruction. They will enslave you with your libertarian platitudes and watch you bury yourself alive with them.
Dude, you don't have a constitutional right to vote on the Democratic (or Republican) party's presidential candidate. You have the right to vote for anyone who meets the requirements to be elected president in the general election. They don't even have to be on the ballot; you can write in anyone you choose.
Members of the Democratic party may have a civil cause of action if the party violated their own internal rules, but only someone who actually donated money to the party could conceivably be awarded any monetary relief. Since you're still free to vote for whoever you want in the presidential election and whoever isn't selected as the Democratic candidate is still free to run, there really aren't any damages for the court to provide relief for.
Even if disregarding the results of a state primary does violate party's own rules, it's unlikely that a court can or would force them to endorse a particular candidate, because compelled speech is barred by the 1st Amendment, which would trump any state election laws.
Bottom line- primary elections are a waste of taxpayer resources, have no basis in the Constitution, and have impermissively drawn government into the internal workings of private political parties. They should be abolished. Barring that, as private entities the political parties are under no obligation to honor the results from an election run on their behalf by a government body.
Why are states even in the business of primaries anyway?
The Democratic party is a private organization, and can choose its candidate using any method it wants. They have already said that if New Hampshire doesn't do what they want they will simply invalidate the results and take away their delegates, which is their right.
The sole purpose of a primary election is for the political parties to choose their candidate for the general election. Not a single dime of public money, and not a single moment of a government officials time should be spent on this endeavor. It's an entirely internal process to the political parties and they should pay for and administer it however they choose.
Being a “private” corporation doesn’t give the right to circumvent constitutional rights, not to mention their own written bylaws. Being a private corporation does not allow you to defraud. Being a private corporation does not allow you to abuse “freedom of association” especially when your functionally control all paths to power.
Your enemies don’t care about the rules. They care about your destruction. They will enslave you with your libertarian platitudes and watch you bury yourself alive with them.
Dude, you don't have a constitutional right to vote on the Democratic (or Republican) party's presidential candidate. You have the right to vote for anyone who meets the requirements to be elected president in the general election. They don't even have to be on the ballot; you can write in anyone you choose.
Members of the Democratic party may have a civil cause of action if the party violated their own internal rules, but only someone who actually donated money to the party could conceivably be awarded any monetary relief. Since you're still free to vote for whoever you want in the presidential election and whoever isn't selected as the Democratic candidate is still free to run, there really aren't any damages for the court to provide relief for.
Even if disregarding the results of a state primary does violate party's own rules, it's unlikely that a court can or would force them to endorse a particular candidate, because compelled speech is barred by the 1st Amendment, which would trump any state election laws.
Bottom line- primary elections are a waste of taxpayer resources, have no basis in the Constitution, and have impermissively drawn government into the internal workings of private political parties. They should be abolished. Barring that, as private entities the political parties are under no obligation to honor the results from an election run on their behalf by a government body.