Credentialed public health "experts" are just like martial arts styles, fakes and frauds that cannot face real questions that challenge base assumptions.
This was a good read, I highly recommend it.
Some great quotes:
it took team reality 3 months to go from “never looked at this before” to basic parity with public health and in 3 more, it had overrun the discipline.
And later:
the “experts” have had a REALLY bad 2 years. their credentials and lazy appeals to authority did not stand up to the arena. and they stopped wanting to talk to us at all and adopted epithets like “denier” and stances like “the science is settled.”
Where have we seen that language used before?
Oh yea, climate science. Funny, isn't it, how the credentialed always do the same thing when the amateurs pull their fancy pants down to their ankles?
There’s a lot of “social science” fields that are currently propped up by shitty computer modeling, public health is one of those fields. There was a “study” I posted here pre Covid about “racial bias” and pain meds, the study was just a survey where people who were given the same dosage across the board said they “didn’t feel the pain treatment was adequate” and the survey itself was a nightmare because it was Medicaid/medicare patients only… public health as a field is basically politburo where the job is to find whatever the money/agenda says to find. In almost every single encounter with lesser sciences I’ve had it is always very agenda driven, even most medical professions are so subverted that diagnostic medicine is going to have to be ai driven in the near future due to the complete lack of competence.