Just got to thinking about this after those threads on The Expanse and Military Sci-Fi (which admittedly is probably the sub-genre least affected by this trend).
I know the case can be made for the existence of some conservative authors or sometimes conservative themes, of course they exist, but are they “swimming upstream” so-to-speak? Going against the flow of “the mainstream” of Sci-Fi?
I’m not looking for a list of conservative authors by the way, I want to hear if the people here think that Sci-Fi as a genre may or may not have an inherent bias towards the new, the previously unseen, and thus “progressive” ideas and ideologies. Not even necessarily to castigate Sci-Fi, merely to attempt to understand what’s happening.
The “Sad Puppies” folks probably have some insights on this subject but I don’t know much about them beyond their existence and their claim that the Sci-Fi book awards system has been subverted by leftist/progressive ideologues:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sad_Puppies
Sad Puppies activists accused the Hugo Awards "of giving awards on the basis of political correctness and favoring authors and artists who aren't straight, white and male".
I do see the ideas of sci-if and “progressivism” as connected, but I’m not sure if that’s an inherent aspect of the genre, or if that is perhaps a cultural relic. I lean towards the idea that it is likely largely cultural (i.e. well respected sci-fi authors of old put “culturally progressive” themes in their books about Scientific “progress”, and that has carried on to this day) but I’m interested in where everyone else falls on the subject.
That's because the term progress is yrt another appropriation of the left.
Evil views itself as inevitable.
We’re certainly marching towards a cliff.
How do you deal with the reality that everyone sees themselves as “the Good guy, fighting Evil”?
Because that statement isn't true, simply put. It's Hollywood nonsense, just like that old, remarkably stupid equivocation of one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Or that hate leads to the dark side.
Take a good long look at the left, past and present, and tell me that they not only don't know they're the bad guys, but that they don't revel in it.
I dunno dude, I kind of feel like you’re operating in some kind of ontological realm where Truth is something that’s even considered by all, much less understood and agreed upon. That’s not to say that Truth doesn’t exist or any such postmodernist claptrap, I think our lives should, on the whole, be dedicated to the pursuit of Truth. I just also acknowledge that earnest, dedicated seekers (much less the unthinking hordes) can come to different conclusions, especially at different points in time / their lives.
Is not one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter? One man’s junk another’s treasure? Like I say I’m not so sure.
In my experience, everyone who disagrees with me from the left, when pressed, thinks they are being “good”/“kind”/“tolerant” [ed. blegh] in their approach and thus that I am being evil/mean/wrong in mine. Of course their minds and moral frameworks are stuck in the mire of postmodernist brain rot, but within that mire they’ve been convinced of the shit they believe.
If it has to be "agreed on", it's not a truth at all. It's a consensus, crass democracy posing as truth.
And in my experience with terrorists, they know full well exactly what they are.
As for the left, you're making the mistake of assuming that their professed motivations are accurate, or even honest. Bad faith is a matter of course for these people.