How appropriate for a wikipedia citation, considering that wikipedia itself is built upon the fake and gay REPUTABLE/RELIABLE qualifier, which should have never become a thing. A claim is either true or not and needs to stand on its own merits, whether it comes from Alex Jones or the WHO.
They should probably ban secondary or tertiary sources from being cited in community notes in the first place.
How appropriate for a wikipedia citation, considering that wikipedia itself is built upon the fake and gay REPUTABLE/RELIABLE qualifier, which should have never become a thing. A claim is either true or not and needs to stand on its own merits, whether it comes from Alex Jones or the WHO.
They should probably ban secondary or tertiary sources from being cited in community notes in the first place.