Both the "trans" people I've known were very clearly pressured into it by malevolent women, I would really love to see this kill off the trans-industrial-complex.
We shouldn't be hacking healthy body parts off for profit.
Anyone who categorizes a procedure as "100% always bad, never do it, or 100% always good, no matter the circumstances, nothing between" is lying to themselves.
Barbers cut pieces off you all the time, your hair. By their logic, that must mean they must be fine with barbers cutting other chunks off you too.
Doctors giving known poisons to patients? What we call "Rat poison" is one of the most common things doctors will give patients as a blood thinner if that is called for.
A drug that'll turn your brain off? Anesthetic, I mean, pretty important to turn people's brains off during some of those surgeries.
Everything has context. Even chemical castration, the procedure that many "trans" people undergo nowadays, was at one point a known punishment for pedophelia and/or sexual assault to at least mitigate some of those potential damages in future, a (questionably, depending on your hard-on-crime levels) valid medical use of the tech.
Anyone who categorizes a procedure as "100% always bad, never do it, or 100% always good, no matter the circumstances, nothing between" is lying to themselves.
I have a total legit medical procedure where I need to stick my dick inside women while they're unconscious for...some reason.
Totally legit guys.
Also, children. Ponies. Goats. Animals. If you say this is bad, no matter the circumstances, you are lying to yourself. (rolls eyes)
Anesthesia with in-vitro fertilization procedures on a naturapath kick not wanting to metallically insert a baster instead, could have validity. 99.999% isn't 100%.
Both the "trans" people I've known were very clearly pressured into it by malevolent women, I would really love to see this kill off the trans-industrial-complex.
We shouldn't be hacking healthy body parts off for profit.
Someone will say "what about plastic surgery?".
Well plastic surgery isn't meant to cause what's operated on to become dysfunctional.
I would argue that plastic surgery to remove a mole, or a breast reduction to fix lifelong physical issue has a use.
Whereas plastic surgery that results in something like this should perhaps be banned one way or another as well:
https://static.toiimg.com/thumb/msid-44925198,width-1070,height-580,imgsize-122127,resizemode-75,overlay-toi_sw,pt-32,y_pad-40/photo.jpg
Anyone who categorizes a procedure as "100% always bad, never do it, or 100% always good, no matter the circumstances, nothing between" is lying to themselves.
Barbers cut pieces off you all the time, your hair. By their logic, that must mean they must be fine with barbers cutting other chunks off you too.
Doctors giving known poisons to patients? What we call "Rat poison" is one of the most common things doctors will give patients as a blood thinner if that is called for.
A drug that'll turn your brain off? Anesthetic, I mean, pretty important to turn people's brains off during some of those surgeries.
Everything has context. Even chemical castration, the procedure that many "trans" people undergo nowadays, was at one point a known punishment for pedophelia and/or sexual assault to at least mitigate some of those potential damages in future, a (questionably, depending on your hard-on-crime levels) valid medical use of the tech.
I have a total legit medical procedure where I need to stick my dick inside women while they're unconscious for...some reason.
Totally legit guys.
Also, children. Ponies. Goats. Animals. If you say this is bad, no matter the circumstances, you are lying to yourself. (rolls eyes)
Anesthesia with in-vitro fertilization procedures on a naturapath kick not wanting to metallically insert a baster instead, could have validity. 99.999% isn't 100%.