I think criminalizing art is retarded. I think criminalizing art with the whole 'eye of the beholder' thing is even more retarded. Guess I must be a pedo.
Also, you're either so ideologically absorbed, you didn't read/look, or you're just trolling. They're assigning ages to fictional drawn characters, and applying age of consent laws. That's peak retardation. An image of a character that looks perfectly adult, but is "canonically" 17 or something, is now illegal to possess.
I hate pedos as much as the next person, but that is absolutely fucking retarded, and has no connections to pedophilia. Stop being a retard.
However, I am not in that group, if that's what you're implying. And I don't think people should get ovens/woodchippers based on the anime waifus they happen to look at. Touch children, get the woodchipper/oven. No argument here.
The problem is the image is not a person but the law seems to treat it as one. There's no victim but it's "child abuse," surely you can recognize that that's retarded.
Can't wait to see all the pedos in this forum out themselves by crying about this. C'mon out chomos. Let's see who you are.
I think criminalizing art is retarded. I think criminalizing art with the whole 'eye of the beholder' thing is even more retarded. Guess I must be a pedo.
Also, you're either so ideologically absorbed, you didn't read/look, or you're just trolling. They're assigning ages to fictional drawn characters, and applying age of consent laws. That's peak retardation. An image of a character that looks perfectly adult, but is "canonically" 17 or something, is now illegal to possess.
I hate pedos as much as the next person, but that is absolutely fucking retarded, and has no connections to pedophilia. Stop being a retard.
Pizza lovers get the oven
I prefer woodchippers, but yes.
However, I am not in that group, if that's what you're implying. And I don't think people should get ovens/woodchippers based on the anime waifus they happen to look at. Touch children, get the woodchipper/oven. No argument here.
But you're still being retarded.
The problem is the image is not a person but the law seems to treat it as one. There's no victim but it's "child abuse," surely you can recognize that that's retarded.