How does it make sense to suggest that the non-whites here think that non-whites are inferior?
first off, which is an obvious one. the mulattoes in question. what makes their unhinged nature, different then someone who is of... "one" race?
They seem to be lost in some sort of cultural no man's land. If you look at extreme racial activists, mulattoes are very much overrepresented among them: e.g. Nicole hannah-Jones, Kaepernick. I think it is much more likely for them to have an identity crisis, to not really know who they are, when this is not the case for someone who is at least in his own mind fully white or fully black.
Also, have you noticed that mulattoes - who are more than 50% white - still identify as black. Is there any one who identifies as white?
who cares about distinctiveness?
I like distinctiveness. I like that France has its own culture, and Italy its own, and Spain its own, and America its own lack of culture. I don't want cultures and peoples to be turned into a global homogeneous goo.
and telling other people what they can, and cannot do
Nowhere did I state that I told anyone what he can't do.
what if your kids wanted to date someone outside of their race, area, and country and religion?
Now that I wouldn't like.
if you remove laws that fight discrimination... what would you think would happen? people who couldn't discriminate openly will now do so openly...
And what will happen when people discriminate 'openly'? 98% of people won't like that, so those businesses will be in serious trouble.
those groups would gladly tell me to drink from a black only water fountain. if they thought it would help black people.
I doubt that. What they do is legitimated by 'helping black people', but blacks are just their mascots. And like with all the other mascots, the best interests of their mascots are never the issue.
equality does not discriminate. so a removal of the civil rights act. would cause more problems, then it will fix. i think what your looking for, is a re-imagining of the civil rights bill.
I'm generally for "mend it, don't end it", and I don't have any principled objections to it, but unfortunately, courts just ignore those provisions. The original Civil Rights Act, and the legislative history, are already as good as can be - e.g. banning racial preferences and expressing in leghist that tests are allowed. Courts ignored it and imposed their own vision.
Oh please. I’m not self hating. I said if people want to associate with their own race they should be able to. I’ll associate with anyone. Didn’t I say I’m fine with interracial dating and I’m not 100% blacks so I got some white and a little Native American Wow, you sound like the typical moronic leftist. Also, for those here who openly hate non whites, what am I going to say that will change their minds.
I’m really disappointed in you. You are just as bad as the ones on the other extreme of you
How does it make sense to suggest that the non-whites here think that non-whites are inferior?
They seem to be lost in some sort of cultural no man's land. If you look at extreme racial activists, mulattoes are very much overrepresented among them: e.g. Nicole hannah-Jones, Kaepernick. I think it is much more likely for them to have an identity crisis, to not really know who they are, when this is not the case for someone who is at least in his own mind fully white or fully black.
Also, have you noticed that mulattoes - who are more than 50% white - still identify as black. Is there any one who identifies as white?
I like distinctiveness. I like that France has its own culture, and Italy its own, and Spain its own, and America its own lack of culture. I don't want cultures and peoples to be turned into a global homogeneous goo.
Nowhere did I state that I told anyone what he can't do.
Now that I wouldn't like.
And what will happen when people discriminate 'openly'? 98% of people won't like that, so those businesses will be in serious trouble.
I doubt that. What they do is legitimated by 'helping black people', but blacks are just their mascots. And like with all the other mascots, the best interests of their mascots are never the issue.
I'm generally for "mend it, don't end it", and I don't have any principled objections to it, but unfortunately, courts just ignore those provisions. The original Civil Rights Act, and the legislative history, are already as good as can be - e.g. banning racial preferences and expressing in leghist that tests are allowed. Courts ignored it and imposed their own vision.
Oh please. I’m not self hating. I said if people want to associate with their own race they should be able to. I’ll associate with anyone. Didn’t I say I’m fine with interracial dating and I’m not 100% blacks so I got some white and a little Native American Wow, you sound like the typical moronic leftist. Also, for those here who openly hate non whites, what am I going to say that will change their minds.
I’m really disappointed in you. You are just as bad as the ones on the other extreme of you