"To preserve the sanctity of those murdered by Hamas" (The Jerusalem Post)
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-774511
This comes on the heels of new footage corroborating that IDF Apache helicopters may have accidentally fired on Israeli soldiers and civilians, as the Hamas terrorists executing the Oct 7th attacks did not appear to have the capabilities to incinerate cars and structures, followed by admission by the Israeli government (The Cradle)
https://new.thecradle.co/articles-id/13111
Destroying these cars will permanently destroy evidence that could allow a conclusive investigation to take place.
Apparently, I'm actually retarded. It took me this long to figure out a way out of your oh-so-just sentencing. How about I just replace the offending word with zionist? Would that break any rules here? Let's give it a try...
My offending comment:
Hmmm... Doesn't have the same ring of truth... Also, I put they in there, because, apparently, implying that someone is a zionist is against the rules as well. Let me know if this comment is kosher.
Implying someone is a Zionist is no different than implying someone is a feminist.
The difference between women and feminist is the difference between jew and zionist.
Ideologues are not identity groups.
Thank you for this wonderful teachable moment. Only a truly enlightened soul like yourself could show as much patience to a stupid faggot like myself. My sock accounts and I vow never to post how much we want to kill the jews anymore.
Plot twist: You're the faggot.