Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

67
Quick way to determine who the bigger threat is: name three politicians who DO espouse white nationalism - name three politicians who DON’T espouse zionism
posted 2 years ago by Graphenium 2 years ago by Graphenium +67 / -0

If you can’t that means zionists control the US government and white nationalists are a non-entity

33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– thisisanaccountname 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I easily named 3 politicians who are openly anti-zionist. Does that mean you're wrong? No, it means you made a dumb argument. It works the same way from the other end. That is why this is a retarded thought exercise.

I forgot my old account, which I lurked on anyways.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I easily named 3 politicians who are openly anti-zionist.

No, you listed three diversity hires (funnily enough leaving off the jew AOC) who support a boycott movement. Can you quote any of them saying they are explicitly “anti-zionist” or are you only capable of conflation?

Does that mean you're wrong?

Read the title and post body again retard, it’s a package deal and you admit you can’t even begin to answer half of it.

No, it means you made a dumb argument.

Cool story faggot

I forgot my old account, which I lurked on anyways.

As unlikely as that is, I’m glad you found my thought experiment so provocative you decided to make a new one

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– thisisanaccountname 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

No, you listed three diversity hires (funnily enough leaving off the jew AOC) who support a boycott movement. Can you quote any of them saying they are explicitly “anti-zionist” or are you only capable of conflation?

And now you're arguing like a jew because you're wrong. BDS is explicitly anti-zionist and their website even says how being anti-zionist isn't the same as being anti-semetic.

Read the title and post body again retard, it’s a package deal and you admit you can’t even begin to answer half of it.

This is absolutely retarded. What does it mean that I can name 3 politicians who are anti-zionist, then? If you say it still means the US is controlled by zionists, the whole thing is worthless.

As unlikely as that is, I’m glad you found my thought experiment so provocative you decided to make a new one

I guess. I feel baited, but I did bite. So you did win on that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Graphenium [S] 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Ok so only capable of conflation.

This is absolutely retarded.

You keep saying this but in fact the retarded part is how you were inspired to make a new sock because you don’t know how to read

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– thisisanaccountname 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

How disingenuous can you be? Even this will probably be handwaved by you in some way, but I'll link it anyways: https://archive.is/1Md2d

If you can’t that means zionists control the US government and white nationalists are a non-entity

And if you can fulfil half of what you asked, what becomes of this retarded thought excercise? It still means that white nationalists are a non-threat and a non-entity. Are you going to say that because I named anti-zionists, white nationalists are a threat (which is retarded)? Because it'd be equally retarded to say that because I can't name white nationalists, that zionists aren't a threat and don't have power.

Retool this horribly constructed thought experiment. And don't be a double retard and try to use it on any normie, let alone a lib/prog/dem/another type of faggot if you're trying to make a point about zionist control of the US.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy