"Communism" is largely just the jewish ideology of total government control. Marx was jewish. Trotsky was jewish. Much of the communist governments in eastern europe were jewish, even Putin admits to this. The cultural marxists of the Frankfurt school were almost all jewish. It was not an entirely jewish movement, but the people in positions of power were disproportionately jewish. I suggest watching this video by William Pierce for some blunt history.
Capitalism vs. Communism was really "money jews vs. power jews" about which one would better be able to control Europe and America. It turned out that capitalism (using banks, inflation, etc) was the more subtle one and worked better on America.
Thanks for the link I’ll check that out, and I agree with what you laid out (I usually call it Bolshevism, but I admit it is a far older ideology, even appearing in the early AD era Jerusalem, funnily enough leading to its original downfall and the center of Christianity moving to Rome, but I digress)
But I really want to nail down the differences (and similarities) between national socialism and whatever you want to call Communism/Bolshevism/Globalism/etc
They are both Authoritarian, as in they both show explicit command of power over the government and people with force. As opposed to democracy, liberalism, etc, which show that in more subtle ways but still ultimately do come down to force and power in the end it's just different set dressing.
It's like a gun, a good guy with a gun will be restrained when using it, aim carefully, make sure their target is deserving of it, etc. A bad guy using a gun will flash it to intimidate people, use it whenever they feel like, shoot people because they are acting out emotionally, etc.
The question of government is ultimately how many "good guys" you have running it as opposed to "bad guys" in the end.
"Communism" is largely just the jewish ideology of total government control. Marx was jewish. Trotsky was jewish. Much of the communist governments in eastern europe were jewish, even Putin admits to this. The cultural marxists of the Frankfurt school were almost all jewish. It was not an entirely jewish movement, but the people in positions of power were disproportionately jewish. I suggest watching this video by William Pierce for some blunt history.
Capitalism vs. Communism was really "money jews vs. power jews" about which one would better be able to control Europe and America. It turned out that capitalism (using banks, inflation, etc) was the more subtle one and worked better on America.
Thanks for the link I’ll check that out, and I agree with what you laid out (I usually call it Bolshevism, but I admit it is a far older ideology, even appearing in the early AD era Jerusalem, funnily enough leading to its original downfall and the center of Christianity moving to Rome, but I digress)
But I really want to nail down the differences (and similarities) between national socialism and whatever you want to call Communism/Bolshevism/Globalism/etc
They are both Authoritarian, as in they both show explicit command of power over the government and people with force. As opposed to democracy, liberalism, etc, which show that in more subtle ways but still ultimately do come down to force and power in the end it's just different set dressing.
It's like a gun, a good guy with a gun will be restrained when using it, aim carefully, make sure their target is deserving of it, etc. A bad guy using a gun will flash it to intimidate people, use it whenever they feel like, shoot people because they are acting out emotionally, etc.
The question of government is ultimately how many "good guys" you have running it as opposed to "bad guys" in the end.