Again this is a feature, not a bug, of the feminist concept of 'objectification'. Except perhaps in the context of sex trafficking, men don't treat women as inanimate chattel. It's not a thing that happens at all except through feminist manipulation of language. 'Object' can mean whatever they want it to mean as long as it they get to push this false concept to demonise male heterosexual desire.
To feminists, a sex object is any female character who is even slightly sexually appealing to men. You can have a female character who is smart and strong, but if she has one boob shot, she is a sex object for men. Anything meant to make men like sexy women in media is evil to them and they even admit it.
Objects of affection, objects of adoration, objects of admiration, objects of worship...
Saying "objects" is WAY too ambiguous.
Again this is a feature, not a bug, of the feminist concept of 'objectification'. Except perhaps in the context of sex trafficking, men don't treat women as inanimate chattel. It's not a thing that happens at all except through feminist manipulation of language. 'Object' can mean whatever they want it to mean as long as it they get to push this false concept to demonise male heterosexual desire.
Good point.
To feminists, a sex object is any female character who is even slightly sexually appealing to men. You can have a female character who is smart and strong, but if she has one boob shot, she is a sex object for men. Anything meant to make men like sexy women in media is evil to them and they even admit it.