What a strange article. The phrasing is awkward, and there are some obvious grammatical errors like "It's is a shame..." which is doubly odd considering the article is listed as an "EDITORS' PICK". Did the editors actually bother to read it? Did the author?
Also, I am not opposed to self promotion, but referencing two of your own articles (granted, they are on topic and relevant enough) to argue your point feels excessive and maybe a bit desperate, though when you are reviewing a movie that is claimed to require watching two tv shows and another movie to fully appreciate, I guess that is fair.
Thankfully, the comments are having none of it from what I saw, with only a single defender amongst them. Everyone needs a hobby, and "Jeff" has decided that white knighting for bad movies on Forbes is it.
What a strange article. The phrasing is awkward, and there are some obvious grammatical errors like "It's is a shame..." which is doubly odd considering the article is listed as an "EDITORS' PICK". Did the editors actually bother to read it? Did the author?
Also, I am not opposed to self promotion, but referencing two of your own articles (granted, they are on topic and relevant enough) to argue your point feels excessive and maybe a bit desperate, though when you are reviewing a movie that is claimed to require watching two tv shows and another movie to fully appreciate, I guess that is fair.
Thankfully, the comments are having none of it from what I saw, with only a single defender amongst them. Everyone needs a hobby, and "Jeff" has decided that white knighting for bad movies on Forbes is it.