How is extending voting times in a deep blue city not shady as fuck? And they haven't elected a d governor since 1999. They've been red longer than VA has been blue, so why is a d win in MS somehow more plausible than an r win in VA?
Because shit happens sometimes? We tried to extend voting times in az in 22, so either that's shady too, or there can be legit reasons for it. Provide literally any evidence of attempted fraud. I'll wait.
Both are plausible, and we almost got VA, but it's been a blue state for a long time. Just like a d governor is plausible in Louisiana, but they didn't quite get there.
Funny how I can look at both situations and apply the same logic, and it works.
Maricopa County looks pretty purple to me, and it's getting bluer each year. That's not equivalent, so you're not applying the same logic. The equivalent would be the GOP asking to extend voting hours in a bunch of rural counties.
Provide literally any evidence of attempted fraud. I'll wait.
How is letting one of the most partisan areas in the state have extra voting hours not unfairly tilting the election?
Maybe I just don't have a year to get enough evidence to prove you wrong. But really what's the point? You're narrowly focusing on classic fraud in a bad faith attempt to avoid discussing the bigger picture. Ballot stuffing isn't the only way to rig an election, and they could have limited polling in red areas to a 15 minute window and you would still be claiming I have "no proof" of fraud. If you're going to move the goalposts like a Redditor just tell me you're not interested in good faith discussion and we can end this conversation now. I'll even let you have the last word.
How is extending voting times in a deep blue city not shady as fuck? And they haven't elected a d governor since 1999. They've been red longer than VA has been blue, so why is a d win in MS somehow more plausible than an r win in VA?
Because shit happens sometimes? We tried to extend voting times in az in 22, so either that's shady too, or there can be legit reasons for it. Provide literally any evidence of attempted fraud. I'll wait.
Both are plausible, and we almost got VA, but it's been a blue state for a long time. Just like a d governor is plausible in Louisiana, but they didn't quite get there.
Funny how I can look at both situations and apply the same logic, and it works.
Don't be a retard.
Maricopa County looks pretty purple to me, and it's getting bluer each year. That's not equivalent, so you're not applying the same logic. The equivalent would be the GOP asking to extend voting hours in a bunch of rural counties.
How is letting one of the most partisan areas in the state have extra voting hours not unfairly tilting the election?
Okay, so you have no proof. Thanks.
Maybe I just don't have a year to get enough evidence to prove you wrong. But really what's the point? You're narrowly focusing on classic fraud in a bad faith attempt to avoid discussing the bigger picture. Ballot stuffing isn't the only way to rig an election, and they could have limited polling in red areas to a 15 minute window and you would still be claiming I have "no proof" of fraud. If you're going to move the goalposts like a Redditor just tell me you're not interested in good faith discussion and we can end this conversation now. I'll even let you have the last word.