I've compiled two half-hour soundtracks done so far: Swamp and Dungeon.
- Swamp is about fighting magical creatures from European myth in a swamp.
- Dungeon is about delving a typical roguelike dungeon. Not the deep tunnels of the Underdark, or a tomb, for example.
DCSS soundtrack | YouTube playlist
I searched Pixabay for relevant royalty-free songs, then arranged them in a thematic lyrics-free playlist suitable for videogaming. Then I added a fantasy art slideshow to make it a YouTube video. The pictures are sequenced to suggest a story.
r/GameMusic appreciated my first soundtrack. r/RoguelikeDev is also very interested in free soundtracks, but the mods won't allow me to post my playlist there, because anything even tangentially related to my fork of DCSS isn't allowed. The main roguelike subreddits have banded together to forbid mention of my fork, because I observed that SJWs took over the DCSS community and ruined it.
This behavior is not specific to me; they previously banned mention of Malcolm Rose's fork of DCSS. Malcolm is the top DCSS streaker, and was banned by the DCSS mods for being conservative. The roguelikes subreddits embargoed and killed Malcolm's fork, because he was not aware that SJWs converge institutions against conservatives.
However, I anticipate the persecution and simply document it to build the case for replacing the converged institutions entirely. Reddit is rotten to the core. It is owned by Advance Publications, a Jewish company fostering a cultural revolution led by tranny mods. Github has a speech code as well, so my documentation is on the censorship-free Gitgud.io Gitlab instance.
Every bikini-clad beauty I include in my soundtrack videos reminds these miserable lunatics that they will never be a real woman. That's why the logo of r/dcsf is a naked water nymph. Forget stupid MacGuffins; a beautiful woman is the only prize worth fighting for!
What a load of shit, it is interesting though how naked it's all getting, the normies can't feign ignorance for much longer when they're openly targeting people for politics while faking being apolitical constantly because a lot of them do this and I get so pissed off about it.
What's GitGud.io? It it a github clone of some kind? I may copy-paste my own code just in case because I could see the fucking leftists targeting my work at some point as well simply because I refuse to be woke. We definitely need to take more steps to free infrastructure from the leftists as a whole so they can't continue doing this.
GitLab instance. Github and GitLab (possibly others) were censoring offensive language and/or gamergate back from the start. I stumbled upon it within the past week because the referenced example of the +nigger license out in the wild was hosted there.
Off-topic: Often enough a random dipshit in an arbitrary Reddit thread, lakotajames in this case, will have activity in the first KiA, positively or negatively upvoted. False intellectual diversity if you ask me. The user in question is the type to downvote any disagreement within 20 minutes of a response, because fuck netiquette and self-awareness.
I've always been against the arbitrary voting systems as a way of measuring engagement, it should be down to comment activity more than some easy to exploit vote people click on. It's precisely why I avoid mainstream sites now because I want engagement from human beings rather than endless bots and sock puppet accounts. It's also why I think that any voting system should have the user listed so you can check out if it's some alt-account downvoting you constantly and it usually is.
One thing I wish is that there is a hell of a lot more transparency overall with metric. Weird ramble I know but I've been thinking about it a lot in relation to bot exploits and how common they are now. A solution I found for view botting would be to let you see which users have clicked on what, the metrics are likely already there on the back end for that. You could quickly then find out who is shamelessly view botting within about five seconds and it would reveal all sorts of stats about various users and channels.
Site owners will never fucking implement any of that, because it would tell you exactly which owners are honest and which are scamming and I think almost all of them are faking their engagement to one degree or another.
one thing discuss did right i would admit is they let you see just that who did what...