She arrived at the Ottawa courthouse on Elgin St. with police protection.
What a loser, nobody cares about her bitch ass.
At the POEC, Li said she remembered police arriving at her apartment building to investigate whether residents were throwing eggs at protesters. But at the trial, Li maintained she had only read about the police visit on a Facebook page for her residence.
Greenspon asked why she had been talking to her lawyer, Emilie Taman, over the lunch break. Li testified that she was only discussing lunch plans and had only talked to Taman for "not more than five to 10 minutes.” Greenspon asked whether she had discussed her testimony with Taman – which would have been a violation of court orders.
Li has also inferred that a truck that she believed was driven by a Convoy protester, backed into her during an altercation. But on Monday she acknowledged there was no contact “only because I moved out of the way.”
What a loser, nobody cares about her bitch ass.
Is it unusual to have a court order specifically prohibiting a witness from discussing their testimony with their attorney?
Never heard of this before.
Is it because her attorney is technically not at either the defense or prosecution's table in this case?
It's a violation of court orders ie court rules, not a specific court order like Ham v Eggs.
It's as evilplushie says, she was in the midst of being deposed. And no way you need 10 minutes to figure out where to go for lunch.