Ha
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
It's always about trying to throw off the scent of them being into shit that's so fucked up it makes this stuff look vanilla. Male feminists and troons are notorious for this.
I've said it before, I'll say it again: Anti loli and shota(usually people will ignore that last one for whatever reason even though it's exactly the same) people are outright red flags. It's probably virtue signaling and deflection come to think of it that's making them speak out against it...or that other people enjoy something while they cannot look @ actual children and seethe about it.
Thing is: people don't even have to like it, yea I know it's weird. But being entirely anti raises some red flags. Not only are those people probably what I mentioned in the sentences above, they're also often times clogging report forms meant for actual victims. I've seen countless times people brag and post how they reported this and that artist for their loli art by going to places meant for reporting actual child abuse. Utter scum.
IDK. I'm not necessarily advocating that everyone who likes explicit loli/shota content is a pedo or something and should be arrested, but I think the world would be better if it were banned everywhere. You just can't get away from the fact that they're designed to look like children, and it's creepy and disturbing that stuff like that is socially acceptable in some spheres of the internet.
Thing is though: it's a bodytype. That's how you get the 600 year old vampires or someone like Rebecca from Cyberpunk. Yes, it's weird but I got less of an issue with people liking that then people watching cuties and saying it's a great movie. Actual child exploitation is disgusting and should be banned in all media(including cuties, beauty pageants etc), fictional "children" are just that: fictional.