Which is why they've worked overtime to make prior sexual acts inadmissible in court.
Past behavior is the most reliable predictor of future behavior, and often these things go to trial as little more than he said/she said accusations (which means it's impossible to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt and they never should have gone to trial in the first place, but that's a completely different argument).
"She's done the same exact thing 50 times and never cried rape before" is a powerful statement when you're asking the jury to basically pick who is more credible without any real evidence to support either side. So of course women and the government don't want to let you make that argument.
50$ says there's absolutely stuff in there showing she's a giant whore and he did nothing wrong.
Which is why they've worked overtime to make prior sexual acts inadmissible in court.
Past behavior is the most reliable predictor of future behavior, and often these things go to trial as little more than he said/she said accusations (which means it's impossible to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt and they never should have gone to trial in the first place, but that's a completely different argument).
"She's done the same exact thing 50 times and never cried rape before" is a powerful statement when you're asking the jury to basically pick who is more credible without any real evidence to support either side. So of course women and the government don't want to let you make that argument.
Yeah when I heard about this and took a look at her, I figured she came in there and entrapped him into phone sex for the cause.