*Citation needed. Because most studies state the exact opposite: Violent video games are negatively correlated with violent criminal actions, and while not as heavily researched, the general consensus is the same applies to most other urges, too.

Or in other words, if you could save a million children from harm, but have to admit you're wrong one single time, would you do it? Most politicians won't. It's one of those contrary things, like how increasing the added-penalty zone area around schools for drug crimes, increases the amount of drug crimes around schools. You'd think it would lower it, but no. And you could save lives and livelihoods by reducing the area around schools that are more heavily policed and penalized, but no politician in their right or left mind would ever advocate for LESS area on that regard, no matter the guaranteed, well-researched, well-established, proven good it would do.

Save living, real people, or protect the fictional CG ragdolls from video game violence? It's a tough choice for many, apparently even here.