My analogy did have a correspondence with the previous post:
Shooting immigrants on sight to stop them the inhumane suffering of dying while trying to cross illegally is like killing the unborn to free them from all inhumane future sufferings.
It's the same logic of justifying murder out of "concern" for the victim.
You are purposely mixing things together.
That's the point of analogies.
Your analogy must contain a correspondence or partial similarity, "yours" had none and thus isn't an analogy.
My analogy did have a correspondence with the previous post:
Shooting immigrants on sight to stop them the inhumane suffering of dying while trying to cross illegally is like killing the unborn to free them from all inhumane future sufferings.
It's the same logic of justifying murder out of "concern" for the victim.
No, it isn't, some reasons have been forwarded to you by other users why those two aren't compatible.