Is that what I said? Or did I say that the sensitivity is the same.
You 17 hours ago:
As someone that has actually lost a finger tip, trust me, you don’t even notice the difference
Yes, that is what you said. There's no noticeable difference, so it's at best an useless part of the body. If it's useless, we can cut it then, right? Same for the ears, you won't notice if it's gone, so we can cut it too, right?
far greater when looking at penile cancer, especially when you look at the fact adult circumcision carries far more negatives and harm when having to remove the foreskin that is potentially cancerous.
Or you could simply keep better hygiene. The only difference between the 2 are smegma and phimosis, both easily preventable by correct hygiene (which shouldn't be a problem in any western countries).
We can apply the same logic with teeth, for instance. Bad mouth hygiene = very bad outcomes, potentially fatal. Should we remove all teeth from anyone then and replace them with fake removable teeth? As long as you have any teeth, even fake, you can still eat and chew like usual, so why bother keeping the real ones anyway? And it saves all those people from bad mouth hygiene!
You 17 hours ago:
Yes, that is what you said. There's no noticeable difference, so it's at best an useless part of the body. If it's useless, we can cut it then, right? Same for the ears, you won't notice if it's gone, so we can cut it too, right?
Or you could simply keep better hygiene. The only difference between the 2 are smegma and phimosis, both easily preventable by correct hygiene (which shouldn't be a problem in any western countries).
We can apply the same logic with teeth, for instance. Bad mouth hygiene = very bad outcomes, potentially fatal. Should we remove all teeth from anyone then and replace them with fake removable teeth? As long as you have any teeth, even fake, you can still eat and chew like usual, so why bother keeping the real ones anyway? And it saves all those people from bad mouth hygiene!