I'm all for this but I'm against banning only porn as if that's the fix. If we're going to only ban one thing, then banning public education and reducing taxes will have a much better impact than just banning porn. If tradcucks can't get onboard with banning public education but can be onboard with banning porn then they are a problem. What's going to happen is simply the banning of porn without the banning of all the rest which unfairly targets single men while having minimal impact on the health of society.
Porn does not help the single man, in fact it does the opposite, it's merely one of the reasons for him being a single man to begin with. If you are a single man and you are trying to cope with the fact that you live in a broken society by abusing porn or frankly any other substance, you are destined to be doomed, believe me.
The reason the two aren't comparable is because porn has nothing redeemable about it, it's not a neutral/good thing that's misused for evil, it's purely evil, unlike public education, which can be good but is infested with all sorts of servants of heretics who intentionally misuse it to push evil agendas and corrupt.
The problem for single men isn't porn, it's the low quality of women.
Banning porn does nothing to improve the quality of women. You're trying to increase the male demand side when it's already insanely high. We don't need more men demanding women in society, we need higher quality supply of women for what men demand.
I'm all for this but I'm against banning only porn as if that's the fix. If we're going to only ban one thing, then banning public education and reducing taxes will have a much better impact than just banning porn. If tradcucks can't get onboard with banning public education but can be onboard with banning porn then they are a problem. What's going to happen is simply the banning of porn without the banning of all the rest which unfairly targets single men while having minimal impact on the health of society.
Porn does not help the single man, in fact it does the opposite, it's merely one of the reasons for him being a single man to begin with. If you are a single man and you are trying to cope with the fact that you live in a broken society by abusing porn or frankly any other substance, you are destined to be doomed, believe me.
The reason the two aren't comparable is because porn has nothing redeemable about it, it's not a neutral/good thing that's misused for evil, it's purely evil, unlike public education, which can be good but is infested with all sorts of servants of heretics who intentionally misuse it to push evil agendas and corrupt.
The problem for single men isn't porn, it's the low quality of women.
Banning porn does nothing to improve the quality of women. You're trying to increase the male demand side when it's already insanely high. We don't need more men demanding women in society, we need higher quality supply of women for what men demand.