Let's be real, porn isn't helping the situation, but even if you abolish all pornography tomorrow you still have to address the root problem which is that getting involved with a woman is legally a catastrophic proposition.
Let's be real, porn isn't helping the situation, but even if you abolish all pornography tomorrow you still have to address the root problem which is that getting involved with a woman is legally a catastrophic proposition.
It's way more complicated that that. The effect of porn on relationships isn't one way. While use of porn can help men to obtain sexual satisfaction without being in a relationship, it also feeds the male sex drive which makes more men likely to want to get in a relationship.
This is the reason why feminists have such a inconsistent and unpredictable attitude towards porn. On the one hand it reduces the reliance of men on women, reducing their power, but on the other hand it can increase female sexual power. So their are all sorts of different feminist factions in relation to porn, which generally relates to what benefits they are getting out of the effect of porn on men.
The gynocentric nature of Western society is partly caused by the effect of constant exposure of males to a very softcore form of porn - the highly revealing clothing worn by many females, and sexualised female bodies displayed all over the media. This feeds the male sex drive, making men and boys more dependent on women and more gynocentric due to the halo effect from sexual attraction.
I'm surprised how few men seem to understand this. Most men should be able to see it in themselves if they were properly able to use stoic or mindfulness techniques to assess their feelings about women.
Any right thinking man, if he truly wanted to be free of women and relationships, would do well to stay away from both women and porn for his own good.
Let's be real, porn isn't helping the situation, but even if you abolish all pornography tomorrow you still have to address the root problem which is that getting involved with a woman is legally a catastrophic proposition.
It's way more complicated that that. The effect of porn on relationships isn't one way. While use of porn can help men to obtain sexual satisfaction without being in a relationship, it also feeds the male sex drive which makes more men likely to want to get in a relationship.
This is the reason why feminists have such a inconsistent and unpredictable attitude towards porn. On the one hand it reduces the reliance of men on women, reducing their power, but on the other hand it can increase female sexual power. So their are all sorts of different feminist factions in relation to porn, which generally relates to what benefits they are getting out of the effect of porn on men.
The gynocentric nature of Western society is partly caused by the effect of constant exposure of males to a very softcore form of porn - the highly revealing clothing worn by many females, and sexualised female bodies displayed all over the media. This feeds the male sex drive, making men and boys more dependent on women and more gynocentric due to the halo effect from sexual attraction.
I'm surprised how few men seem to understand this. Most men should be able to see it in themselves if they were properly able to use stoic or mindfulness techniques to assess their feelings about women.
Any right thinking man, if he truly wanted to be free of women and relationships, would do well to stay away from both women and porn for his own good.