The only thing that is a bigger waste of the time than publicly arguing about politics on the internet is privately arguing about them on the internet. I think I'll void crossing that rubicon.
I think things will get steadily worse, more or less. We might get some minor reprieves for a couple of years, but the longer term, overarching trends will remain negative.
Correct on "WG" and yes there is a ton of general misanthropy here. A lot of the stuff they post is social media garbage. They're very reluctant to entertain the idea that their image of white women is being curated by a social media feed with an agenda.
NrX isn't wrong that the media gets used for consent manufacturing, but our system will do things that are widely unpopular like bank bailouts. Winning over the public is just something they do to stabilize things.
As far as WNs, Taylor is good but doesn't touch the JQ. It leads to holes in his world view. TRS/NJP is my biggest influence. Counter Currents is also good. Occidental Observer has some good writers as well, but mileage varies over there.
The only thing that is a bigger waste of the time than publicly arguing about politics on the internet is privately arguing about them on the internet. I think I'll void crossing that rubicon.
We're already there, no one is reading this.
I think things will get steadily worse, more or less. We might get some minor reprieves for a couple of years, but the longer term, overarching trends will remain negative.
Maybe. I tend to think so as well. But I think that things getting worse will result in adjustments along the way, rather than a wholesale sudden swing to white nationalism. Look at all the Dems suddenly concerned about immigration, because it's now their ox being gored.
They're very reluctant to entertain the idea that their image of white women is being curated by a social media feed with an agenda.
To be fair, a lot of young white women are absolutely insufferable. But as I said, this is not due to race. Their problem is not that they're observing that there is a problem here, but their focus on them being white. A lot of brainwashed Indian and Asian women are exactly the same. The corrupting influence of woke Western 'culture' is hardly limited to one race.
NrX isn't wrong that the media gets used for consent manufacturing, but our system will do things that are widely unpopular like bank bailouts. Winning over the public is just something they do to stabilize things.
I think that's where 'democracy' comes in. Allow people the illusion that they are in charge, and they will be less likely to want to get rid of a system. Burnham's Machiavellians was a real eye-opener for me, I always knew that it was a sham, I just didn't know the mechanism by which it is a sham.
As far as WNs, Taylor is good but doesn't touch the JQ. It leads to holes in his world view.
So what is your view of that if you don't want to go 'Holovey' on them? I've never seen anything beyond "Jews are bad because they're overrepresented among people I don't like". I've never seen anything productive discussion of this issue leads to. Suppose you were able to persuade everyone that Jews are bad. What then?
TRS/NJP is my biggest influence. Counter Currents is also good. Occidental Observer has some good writers as well, but mileage varies over there.
I don't know those two acronyms, and I actually don't know the rest either.
The only thing that is a bigger waste of the time than publicly arguing about politics on the internet is privately arguing about them on the internet. I think I'll void crossing that rubicon.
I think things will get steadily worse, more or less. We might get some minor reprieves for a couple of years, but the longer term, overarching trends will remain negative.
Correct on "WG" and yes there is a ton of general misanthropy here. A lot of the stuff they post is social media garbage. They're very reluctant to entertain the idea that their image of white women is being curated by a social media feed with an agenda.
NrX isn't wrong that the media gets used for consent manufacturing, but our system will do things that are widely unpopular like bank bailouts. Winning over the public is just something they do to stabilize things.
As far as WNs, Taylor is good but doesn't touch the JQ. It leads to holes in his world view. TRS/NJP is my biggest influence. Counter Currents is also good. Occidental Observer has some good writers as well, but mileage varies over there.
We're already there, no one is reading this.
Maybe. I tend to think so as well. But I think that things getting worse will result in adjustments along the way, rather than a wholesale sudden swing to white nationalism. Look at all the Dems suddenly concerned about immigration, because it's now their ox being gored.
To be fair, a lot of young white women are absolutely insufferable. But as I said, this is not due to race. Their problem is not that they're observing that there is a problem here, but their focus on them being white. A lot of brainwashed Indian and Asian women are exactly the same. The corrupting influence of woke Western 'culture' is hardly limited to one race.
I think that's where 'democracy' comes in. Allow people the illusion that they are in charge, and they will be less likely to want to get rid of a system. Burnham's Machiavellians was a real eye-opener for me, I always knew that it was a sham, I just didn't know the mechanism by which it is a sham.
So what is your view of that if you don't want to go 'Holovey' on them? I've never seen anything beyond "Jews are bad because they're overrepresented among people I don't like". I've never seen anything productive discussion of this issue leads to. Suppose you were able to persuade everyone that Jews are bad. What then?
I don't know those two acronyms, and I actually don't know the rest either.