That's not what I was arguing. I was arguing against someone being persecuted by simple association.

As I said, I agree with that - unless evidence of serious crimes comes up.

Maybe I prefaced it badly, but don't put words in my mouth.

My bad if I misread you, but I still think it is a pretty weird argument. Surely, the existence of holocaust museums has nothing at all to do with whether or not it's a good idea to prosecute this man. Maybe you meant: this is symbolic, maybe it'd have been a point worth making if people were very uninformed, but they're not and a good deal of attention is paid to it, citing ...