Just an open question since we keep getting situations like this where the industry effectively admits it is incapable and unwilling to act to stop the worst elements of the industry (child exploitation, human trafficking, forced involvement, rape etc) that it's probably best to just ban the industry together.
Notice though I said using real people, with AI slowly getting better and CGI improving, why do we need real people to make porn? Just have something animated to be realistic enough as I don't give a fuck about pixels or a drawing. Have whatever kink you want, have entire porn snuff films whatever as no REAL people are getting harmed in the making if it. The worst that can happen is stressed artists trying to meet deadlines.
This might also affect adult streamers which is just a bonus as it'll be like a re-run of Projekt Melody when she became more popular since she did more than just strip and stare blankly at the camera till donations came in. A lot of porn or porn in all but name streaming (which I include Twitch on that) get money off just simply being pretty and that's it, denying that as an easy route will probably cause a shift in a lot of media.
I wouldn't advocate a FULL ban as no matter your feeling on it generally, it is a release so going full puritan invites a backlash and probably just forces more men to deal with insufferable feminist women. But just making that release fully fictional based than support an industry that sweeps horrific practices under the rug for money is probably for the best.
Yeah the simp issue is something we'd have an issue with, only realistic solution i can do since this is para social relationship territory is making it so they follow one of the virtual streamers just to introduce a fiction/reality barrier slowly to them and seperate their obsession from focusing on one person.
But they'd all need to see a therapist, an ACTUALLY qualified therapist than a feminist talking point as they have massive issues to become thar obsessive about anyone.
I doubt a therapist will work all that much.
We need to get back to the point where it's easier for men to get into a relationship than it is to waste money on eThots and Vtubers. As much as I enjoy watching Vtubers... yeah. That's not normal, nor good.
How? Yeah, I have no clue. We've undergone a serious social shift and no one has any concrete method to deal with it.
I'd probably have more success combining human and dog dna to create dog-girls and be mankind's TRULY best friend that try to sort out the shit show called 'modern society'
And I'd do the former in a non 'Edward' way...
Yeah, but with AI the real women may end up supplanted by nerds building AI girls. There's no practical reason this can't happen because 99.9% of simps won't even see egirls in person. We also have precedent in successful AI-generated IG influencers, Vtubers, and Andrew Tate's Onlyfans brothel. The Tates of the world may find it easier just to run a stable of AI models.
So wait, you mean instead of the Tate model of a onlyfans girl pretending to respond but it's actually a guy that KNOWS what a guy wants to hear, he can do the same thing but with an AI controlled model so less risk than before?
A few guys doing that would CRIPPLE the slutstream models...
Somehow I missed reading this and I think this is actually a visionary prediction. I believe some Vtubers are already men, right?
Men are way better at targeting and amplifying male sexual desires than women. I don't even know how they could compete.