YouTube really should be liable for that. They made an editorial choice when they demonitized the channel, they acted in the role of publisher, not platform. So to monetize a demonetized channel, they are acknowledging the content as being unfit for publishing, but profiting off of publishing it.
YouTube really should be liable for that. They made an editorial choice when they demonitized the channel, they acted in the role of publisher, not platform. So to monetize a demonetized channel, they are acknowledging the content as being unfit for publishing, but profiting off of publishing it.