Look whose trying to save the nuisance Ethiopian black guy in Japan
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Well the Ethiopian black guy is an American . And i disagree considering black people's tendency to be disruptive regardless of religion. Also BLM is communist, An example of national socialist blacks are the Ugandan leaders
And as i said when muslims cause trouble its in a different way from this guy who is being a public nuisance for fame and money. also he seems to have a Deep State handler thats funding him, he's being paid to do this which probably made him worse
We can see this isn't the case, even in the US during previous eras, let alone other regions. American blacks have been conquered by Leftism and imbued with the resulting National Socialism to such an extent that it has manifested as a cultural icon and is being exported by the US government as a mechanism of control.
British blacks never had this kind of normalized cultural violence or materialism prior to the 2000s. BLM in Britain is an explicit American import. This degenerate and violent culture is one of the reasons Africans have such animosity with American blacks.
They're not Communists, they are Race Marxists, which is the same as National Socialism. The political Left flooded Africa with "Race Marxism" during the post-colonial period, which is why you see people like the Ugandans. A regular Communist is far more materialist in nature than BLM is. Most of the Black Nationalist movement descends from Progressive Nationalism from prior to and during WW1. This is why W.E.B. DuBouis (an active Communist) was inspired to invent the term "Black Folk" after studying the Volkish movements on his trip to Germany.
I dont agree with your definition of National Socialism.
And black people caused trouble even in the earlier days. dont try to pretend they didnt, if they were good at creating and maintaining civilization they would have done it already but they arent because they are naturally disruptive against civilization. There's a reason why White people set up apartheids and separated themselves from blacks.
You are welcome to be wrong about National Socialism. National Socialism is Race Marxism, and it perpetuates all of the same tropes that were in German National Socialism, because the Black Nationalist movement was a Leftwing movement, lead by Communists and Socialists, while adopting and modifying the German Volkish movement for their own purposes. The idea of a specific race of people being descended from a hyperborean race of ultra-superiors that had all of the technological glory of Atlantis is reflected in both Aryanism and Yakub-nonsense.
And you're right, if they were any good at building civilizations, they would have, and they did. So that's sorted. If you want to complain about why they didn't with the speed that you think they should have; there are a litany of explanations for those as well, most involving geography, high protein cash crops, and tamable animals. Or, are we arguing that it's physically impossible for the Irish to form a civilization because the Celts "didn't form a civilization" in the manner you recognize in the time you've decided? We could do the same for the Anglos and declare them to be a lesser & trouble-causing people given the evidence provided to us by Caesar, and the fact that they had a rudimentary civilization until the 1300's while the Arabs and Chinese had far superior ones.
Yes, that's a feature of colonization, and why you are complaining about Demographic Replacement.
Apartheid is a feature of blacks being disruptive in White civilizations.you sound like a leftist going on about "muh colonization" and what do you mean thats why im complaining about demographic replacement ? So you ARENT complaining about White replacement?
You are also welcome to be wrong about national socialism
And the idea that all races are equal and the same is a marxist idea. Races are not the same or equal.