Her husband was the former Deputy Commander of the 77th Brigade, the psychological warfare arm of the British Army which would go on to target British citizens who were critical of the Government, mRNA vaccines and lockdown.
Her father is a well known news and children's television presenter for ITV.
Naturally her stance and actions against Rumble in the last day will get her a prime spot for a future cabinet position.
She's already been a Minister and was one of the guiding lights behind the online safety bill.
That's why I'm worried that her letter isn't simply over-reach of a fantastically over-zealous Select Committee Chairwoman. She's very connected and I struggle to imagine she didn't at least have tacit permission from many Westminster voices before doing this.
I am concerned that she is speaking on behalf of a Government that wants censorship done by proxy of private companies in addition to overreaching and greater powers bestowed upon their newly created but not yet renamed "Ministry of Truth" - Ofcom.
We don't censor, we just advice companies about possible issues and how to correct them. We do not demand compliance, it is completely optional (if you wish to operate in this country...).
-That bitch.
From what I understand, Ofcom already have a lot of power and certainly do not need more.
Yes this isn't just some attention-whoring rogue feminist. Just check her infobox on shittipedia or wherever, she's been well integrated in key departments and committees for years. They all have her back.
Her husband was the former Deputy Commander of the 77th Brigade, the psychological warfare arm of the British Army which would go on to target British citizens who were critical of the Government, mRNA vaccines and lockdown.
Her father is a well known news and children's television presenter for ITV.
Naturally her stance and actions against Rumble in the last day will get her a prime spot for a future cabinet position.
She's already been a Minister and was one of the guiding lights behind the online safety bill.
That's why I'm worried that her letter isn't simply over-reach of a fantastically over-zealous Select Committee Chairwoman. She's very connected and I struggle to imagine she didn't at least have tacit permission from many Westminster voices before doing this.
I am concerned that she is speaking on behalf of a Government that wants censorship done by proxy of private companies in addition to overreaching and greater powers bestowed upon their newly created but not yet renamed "Ministry of Truth" - Ofcom.
We don't censor, we just advice companies about possible issues and how to correct them. We do not demand compliance, it is completely optional (if you wish to operate in this country...).
-That bitch.
From what I understand, Ofcom already have a lot of power and certainly do not need more.
Yes this isn't just some attention-whoring rogue feminist. Just check her infobox on shittipedia or wherever, she's been well integrated in key departments and committees for years. They all have her back.
Or, possibly, she has theirs.