I hardly argue on moral grounds since that is (alarmingly) becoming less and less effective for anything that doesn't involve children so you have a shot infusing the EV push with child exploitation and labour.
I just argue EV is not effective without expansive nuclear power to begin with to shut them up quick. Longer term, EV is a dead end compared to hydrogen power sources and we should more focus on that and nuclear fusion technology. The former being extremely close to being large scale feasible and the latter being still far off.
so you have a shot infusing the EV push with child exploitation and labour.
I tried it on Twitter, some unhinged woman said "you follow Ferrari, you're just a car guy pretending to care" - You really went through my following list?
Unfortunately the left and the right have reduced the effectiveness of moral arguments
The left by being such degenerates that the chaos gods would wall up the warp and say 'we ain't accepting these tainted souls!'
The right by solely relying on moral arguments either to support acts to grab more power like patriot act and the like or not backing it up with a coherent argument afterwards.
Children and pets are the only ones that seem immune to this so far as if you don't accept those you're already at a sociopath level.
I hardly argue on moral grounds since that is (alarmingly) becoming less and less effective for anything that doesn't involve children so you have a shot infusing the EV push with child exploitation and labour.
I just argue EV is not effective without expansive nuclear power to begin with to shut them up quick. Longer term, EV is a dead end compared to hydrogen power sources and we should more focus on that and nuclear fusion technology. The former being extremely close to being large scale feasible and the latter being still far off.
I tried it on Twitter, some unhinged woman said "you follow Ferrari, you're just a car guy pretending to care" - You really went through my following list?
Unfortunately the left and the right have reduced the effectiveness of moral arguments
The left by being such degenerates that the chaos gods would wall up the warp and say 'we ain't accepting these tainted souls!'
The right by solely relying on moral arguments either to support acts to grab more power like patriot act and the like or not backing it up with a coherent argument afterwards.
Children and pets are the only ones that seem immune to this so far as if you don't accept those you're already at a sociopath level.