A group of jews conspiring is just a conspiracy. A group of whites conspiring is just a conspiracy. Jews as a race conspiring as a racial cabal is nonsense and is a violation of Rule 16. Whites as a race conspiring as a racial cabal is nonsense, and is a violation of Rule 16.
I think every day about how to get white people ahead.
Literacy, family, savings, competence. It's actually not that hard, and doesn't require white supremacy, or racialism.
"The Jews" is collectivizing it into the concept of a single, racial, collective. "Okay, one jew may not be involved in the cabal because he overslept and didn't get the email, therefore I'm not saying all jews", isn't a good enough excuse. You are still saying "the racial cabal", as a collective, is doing something. Rather than individuals. The intention is to push a racial Hegelian dialectic where instead of looking at individual behaviors, we are acting as if the races themselves may be accurately homogenized as if they were their own individuals within the dialectic, de-individuating people in the process. That's why it's always inherently false.
"The Jews" speaks perfectly for the fact that it is trying to singularize a plural, instead of treating a plural as a plural.
We can do the same thing with the concept of "The Whites" and "White Supremacy". There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will ever be, a racial cabal of Whites to foster world wide White Supremacy. Ever. Even in places where White Supremacy as an ideology existed, like in Rhodesia, South Africa, or the Jim Crow Southern United States. Whites, as a race, were not acting as a racial cabal. Many whites in South Africa were supporters of the Apartheid Regime, same with many whites in Rhodesia. But we can see from history that it is blindingly obvious that most other whites across the world explicitly opposed White Supremacist ideology, and took aggressive steps to destroy it, even at the benefit of Communism, and to the detriment of blacks living in the hell hole that is currently South Africa and Zimbabwe. Obviously, there was never a White Racial cabal. Even if whites are operating in a way to create and secure segregated political power for themselves in a specific country, this is not indicative of "The Whites objective to dominate control over the world." That would also be a violation of rule 16.
If we're off onto what I actually think, not that we should be, white supremacy sounds kinda dumb, but white separatism does not. If there's anything you ought to learn from (biological) science it's that the definition of "better" varies widely by the circumstances. It would be absurd to declare that white people are better than every other people, and I do not believe that. However, the idea that white people should exist largely amongst themselves, as they and most everyone else did monoculturally for thousands of years, isn't absurd. I think it's worth reflecting, mainly theoretically at this point, on what life would be like without demographic change. What it's going to look like in the future, and what if anything we might want to do to guide that. This very notion that the people of a nation should have some say in its demographics is unexpressable on many forums. So I appreciate that its expression is allowed here.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: No.
Also, you've got this all screwed up.
A group of jews conspiring is just a conspiracy. A group of whites conspiring is just a conspiracy. Jews as a race conspiring as a racial cabal is nonsense and is a violation of Rule 16. Whites as a race conspiring as a racial cabal is nonsense, and is a violation of Rule 16.
Literacy, family, savings, competence. It's actually not that hard, and doesn't require white supremacy, or racialism.
There, I saved the white race. you're welcome.
If I say " all Jews" that's the beginning of a falsehood. So I don't. And if I say Jews are doing this, I mean the Jews that are in fact doing it.
When anyone says "not all Jews" I say OK, but are you one of them? It is a moot point if the speaker is in fact the asshole doing what I do not like.
"The Jews" is collectivizing it into the concept of a single, racial, collective. "Okay, one jew may not be involved in the cabal because he overslept and didn't get the email, therefore I'm not saying all jews", isn't a good enough excuse. You are still saying "the racial cabal", as a collective, is doing something. Rather than individuals. The intention is to push a racial Hegelian dialectic where instead of looking at individual behaviors, we are acting as if the races themselves may be accurately homogenized as if they were their own individuals within the dialectic, de-individuating people in the process. That's why it's always inherently false.
"The Jews" speaks perfectly for the fact that it is trying to singularize a plural, instead of treating a plural as a plural.
We can do the same thing with the concept of "The Whites" and "White Supremacy". There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will ever be, a racial cabal of Whites to foster world wide White Supremacy. Ever. Even in places where White Supremacy as an ideology existed, like in Rhodesia, South Africa, or the Jim Crow Southern United States. Whites, as a race, were not acting as a racial cabal. Many whites in South Africa were supporters of the Apartheid Regime, same with many whites in Rhodesia. But we can see from history that it is blindingly obvious that most other whites across the world explicitly opposed White Supremacist ideology, and took aggressive steps to destroy it, even at the benefit of Communism, and to the detriment of blacks living in the hell hole that is currently South Africa and Zimbabwe. Obviously, there was never a White Racial cabal. Even if whites are operating in a way to create and secure segregated political power for themselves in a specific country, this is not indicative of "The Whites objective to dominate control over the world." That would also be a violation of rule 16.
If we're off onto what I actually think, not that we should be, white supremacy sounds kinda dumb, but white separatism does not. If there's anything you ought to learn from (biological) science it's that the definition of "better" varies widely by the circumstances. It would be absurd to declare that white people are better than every other people, and I do not believe that. However, the idea that white people should exist largely amongst themselves, as they and most everyone else did monoculturally for thousands of years, isn't absurd. I think it's worth reflecting, mainly theoretically at this point, on what life would be like without demographic change. What it's going to look like in the future, and what if anything we might want to do to guide that. This very notion that the people of a nation should have some say in its demographics is unexpressable on many forums. So I appreciate that its expression is allowed here.