Amongst other things. Just find it irritating how they have the nerve to call us out on these things while they have a meltdown because I say men can’t be women, or I was called a white supremacist for saying the little mermaid casting was stupid. But we are the ones who overreact. Az can be over the top at times but I can understand that annoyance of the catering to a tiny delusional percentage of the population.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
The problem is that there's not much recognition on the right that tranny pronouns aren't pronouns, they're titles, but we're all still using the term "pronoun" to refer to them, because it's just too damn difficult to do otherwise.
Pronouns are descriptive. A thing can be blue, or large, or dry, or masculine, and these are all obvious to anyone with functional senses. All a pronoun does is refer to a person in general, using their plainly obvious description, rather than specifically.
Tranny pronouns are titles. They aren't descriptive, they're prescribed. Just like tranny pronouns, your senses don't tell you if somebody is a Sir, or My Lord, or Your Honorable. Trannies have to tell your their pronouns the same as nobility once had to present their titles. And like titles, if you choose not to use one after being told to, you can be punished for it.
Backdooring titles into pronouns makes it damn near impossible to deal with. There's no other language you can fall back on, and it's a complicated enough trick that people aren't going to independently invent and settle on pithy comebacks to their attacks.
My best attempt at a comeback to your example would be something like "They stopped being used like pronouns a long time ago," and that doesn't exactly embed that entire explanation into one sentence, does it? It's one of those end-stage leftist tricks that's so complex and manipulative, I can't imagine how you can beat it with speech. Language and human limitations are more easily weaponized by the dishonest.
Had another thought I want to expand on.
When somebody refers to a normal person by "their" pronouns, it's not because they were told, it's because it's obvious. But it's also because they're being honest. In the most basic terms, they're experiencing the world and truthfully describing their perception. It's not something most of us even need to explain, it's just a natural state of living. Even literal drooling retards do this, to the best of their ability.
If an otherwise intelligent person repeatedly misgendered a normal person, it would be a problem. Not because of it's an insult, but because it's deeply dishonest. That's a level of dishonesty and belligerence that would make them incompatible with polite society. Being honest with your senses is the single most basic form of honesty there is, that's why we medicalize dishonest senses as "delusions." If you aren't suffering from delusions, you're just that dishonest by nature, then you're evil almost by definition.
Trannies use their social power to make us lie to remain in polite society, meaning any time we're in the presence of a tranny, we're a society of sociopaths, choosing to lie about our basic senses. What would otherwise be psychotic, violent anger is a totally healthy and justified reaction to a sociopathic society. Some dude having a whinge is almost too tame, by comparison.
I manage a residence for literal drooling retards ("individuals with developmental disabilities" as I say in my day to day...) -- and this is spot on. If I tried to explain to one of my people that a MAN who looks like a MAN should be called she/her, it would short-circuit their already-faulty wiring.
I mostly appreciate their candor and the bullshit-free existence that they lead.
I think you have a point about titles, but I also think it's just a perversion of perception enforced at gunpoint.