Retraction of Paper Saying There is No Climate Emergency Illustrates How Dependent Climate Activists Are on Scaremongering – The...
The retraction of a paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal because it challenged the idea we're in the midst of a 'climate emergency' shows how science has been corrupted by climate activists.
Peer review is a construct of academia, it was never designed to be a filter of what is considered actual science. "Peer reviewed" was never intended to be a reliable indicator for the reliability of any scientific research, and the heavy gatekeeping of research funding and paper publishing we are seeing today is a prime indicator why.
Furthermore, all warmista climate porn is based on computer models that do not take all energy output of the sun into account, and none of which can be regressed minus 100 years in the past and have their temperature predictions match actual recorded temperature data. All of it is fraudulent, from the very beginning, but unfortunately warmistas now control all the levers of climate research funding and publication, so any research that contradicts the warmista religion is censored, the scientists behind it slandered and sometimes fired, and all funding is denied.