Yep, the ClimateGate.
Heard about it on a podcast episode "Cherry Picking" by Red Pilled America, it was quite a while ago since they broadcasted it but its one of the few which struck me the most.
One of the guys who were in that episode talked about weather data acquisitioning and he recalled that several weather stations throughout USA were measuring record high heat during the summers of mid 2000's. However when they (I think Stephen if my memory serves me right) dug into the measurement of those temperatures, he found out that those "weather stations" were data loggers placed in the middle of a sunbaked parking lot. No wonder they were measuring extreme temperatures. Or how warmer periods of centuries past (such as during the height of the Roman Empire or more recent the draughts of 1930's America) are downplayed to obfuscate the unpredictability of the climate.
It was WUWT. They are the ones that instigated the Surface Stations project, which tried to categorize all temperature stations that were listed as part of the USHCN. http://surfacestations.org/
Suffice to say that the NOAA's data collection is basically bunk, with the majority of temperature stations of record having errors greater than 2 degrees. Anyone who has taken a college level physics lab knows that in propagation of error your error cannot go below the instrument error, no matter how many measurements you average.
Yep, the ClimateGate. Heard about it on a podcast episode "Cherry Picking" by Red Pilled America, it was quite a while ago since they broadcasted it but its one of the few which struck me the most.
One of the guys who were in that episode talked about weather data acquisitioning and he recalled that several weather stations throughout USA were measuring record high heat during the summers of mid 2000's. However when they (I think Stephen if my memory serves me right) dug into the measurement of those temperatures, he found out that those "weather stations" were data loggers placed in the middle of a sunbaked parking lot. No wonder they were measuring extreme temperatures. Or how warmer periods of centuries past (such as during the height of the Roman Empire or more recent the draughts of 1930's America) are downplayed to obfuscate the unpredictability of the climate.
Sadly I forgot the adres of a blog which went further into the data about the matter. Maybe its American Thinker blog or wattsupwiththat
It was WUWT. They are the ones that instigated the Surface Stations project, which tried to categorize all temperature stations that were listed as part of the USHCN. http://surfacestations.org/
Suffice to say that the NOAA's data collection is basically bunk, with the majority of temperature stations of record having errors greater than 2 degrees. Anyone who has taken a college level physics lab knows that in propagation of error your error cannot go below the instrument error, no matter how many measurements you average.
That's right, that's the page, thanks!