Judge Denies Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s Request to Halt YouTube Censorship
(www.breitbart.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
My position is that big tech platforms are a de facto public space. That is how they offered themselves at the start, that is how the public came to them and that it how they are being used. For these platforms to then act as a willfully biased curator is simply not acceptable.
They can't have their cake and eat it to. They either must be forced to serve the public in the manner which they offered their service or they can be made to be accountable for their curation.
This judge is a useful idiot.
The section 230 argument was good for 2014/15 but at this point we have social media taking direct orders from government agencies to act on their behalf.
The idea that anyone can say with a straight face that social media sites are not government actors is either ignorance or hubris and neither is befitting a judge.
I agree but I believe that is a separate issue and is likely going to have to be handled by congress (reminder to all constituents that it is YOUR DUTY to apply pressure on congress members...). And just so we're clear, I see that as a criminal issue on the part of the federal government actors. They are in a very clear willful violation of the founding principles and law of the country.
RIP America
Nobody likes a quitter.