lol, it was a 2-1 ruling, and the third judge (appointed by Bush 1) wanted to put no limit at all on the jail time.
This guy seems to be a pedo. Yet as H.L. Mencken said, if you want to defend justice, the unfortunate fact is that most of the time you will be defending scoundrels. Because rest assured that they try things on pedos first, who have sympathy from no one except the deep state, and then move to dissidents.
He's definitely a pedo. They already found CP on devices that they were able to access. But yeah, this is an awful precedent, and it sounds like it goes against previous 5th amendment jurisprudence that demanding passwords is self incrimination but biometric data is fair game (I don't know how they came up with that one).
lol, it was a 2-1 ruling, and the third judge (appointed by Bush 1) wanted to put no limit at all on the jail time.
This guy seems to be a pedo. Yet as H.L. Mencken said, if you want to defend justice, the unfortunate fact is that most of the time you will be defending scoundrels. Because rest assured that they try things on pedos first, who have sympathy from no one except the deep state, and then move to dissidents.
He's definitely a pedo. They already found CP on devices that they were able to access. But yeah, this is an awful precedent, and it sounds like it goes against previous 5th amendment jurisprudence that demanding passwords is self incrimination but biometric data is fair game (I don't know how they came up with that one).