In the interest of defending scoundrels, the evidence presented is a sister snitch claiming he openly showed her all of it (which doesn't mesh well against a guy smart enough to encrypt his shit on an external), and a handful of pictures "focusing" on the genitals of his niece. Which isn't CP and can simply be badly taken pictures among hundreds of shots unless you can prove the intent was pornographic.
Which they can't or else they already would have. The article makes it clear that they don't really have anything strong enough to make a case on, which is why they were so adamant about the drives.
Like, I'm sure he probably is a pedo based on all the smoke. But so far the only "damning" evidence is them telling us a bunch of clothed photos of a family member were totally uncouth bro just trust us. Which isn't enough for me to even say a court case was ready to be brought.
In the interest of defending scoundrels, the evidence presented is a sister snitch claiming he openly showed her all of it (which doesn't mesh well against a guy smart enough to encrypt his shit on an external), and a handful of pictures "focusing" on the genitals of his niece. Which isn't CP and can simply be badly taken pictures among hundreds of shots unless you can prove the intent was pornographic.
Which they can't or else they already would have. The article makes it clear that they don't really have anything strong enough to make a case on, which is why they were so adamant about the drives.
Like, I'm sure he probably is a pedo based on all the smoke. But so far the only "damning" evidence is them telling us a bunch of clothed photos of a family member were totally uncouth bro just trust us. Which isn't enough for me to even say a court case was ready to be brought.