AI art is basically the same as 3D art. You can use premade models by other people and edit it to be however you want. You can look at Getting Over It and Only Up, both games made with asset store stuff but very different quality.
That being said, copyright is garbage anyways. People went thousands of years with their folk stories being told and retold, imagine how many would have been cut short because somebody "owned" that story.
100% agree. trash copyright laws. all of them. keep patent laws: 7 years max and not transferable from original individual(s). if the company wants to keep the idea they can pay the person(s) that created them.
copyright was supposed to fund new works of art by funding the original creator. that was a jewish lie. what these laws have done is enrich middlemen, speculators, and lawyers.
Yeah a small period like that is fine. Most of the money is made during that period anyways. Being able to buy the copyright for something with none of the original creators involved is very nonsensical.
The Constitution says "...securing for limited times to authors..." The original copyright law in the U.S. was for 7 years and allowed a one time extension for another 7 years. I think that's reasonable. The current law is ridiculous though, life of the author plus 70 years. There's no way that life+70 is a "limited time".
AI art is basically the same as 3D art. You can use premade models by other people and edit it to be however you want. You can look at Getting Over It and Only Up, both games made with asset store stuff but very different quality.
That being said, copyright is garbage anyways. People went thousands of years with their folk stories being told and retold, imagine how many would have been cut short because somebody "owned" that story.
100% agree. trash copyright laws. all of them. keep patent laws: 7 years max and not transferable from original individual(s). if the company wants to keep the idea they can pay the person(s) that created them.
copyright was supposed to fund new works of art by funding the original creator. that was a jewish lie. what these laws have done is enrich middlemen, speculators, and lawyers.
Yeah a small period like that is fine. Most of the money is made during that period anyways. Being able to buy the copyright for something with none of the original creators involved is very nonsensical.
The Constitution says "...securing for limited times to authors..." The original copyright law in the U.S. was for 7 years and allowed a one time extension for another 7 years. I think that's reasonable. The current law is ridiculous though, life of the author plus 70 years. There's no way that life+70 is a "limited time".