The now-infamous (independently produced) Scooby Doo special
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
23-year-old Eagan Tilghman made this in Blender, voiced Scooby, and had two unknown/amateur voices in his cast of seven, the other four being AI recreations of actors from the original series (No, he didn't use an AI Grey Delisle voice).
I don't care for the faux VHS, but I understand it. Guy has talent, but I'm afraid that doesn't carry people as far as it used to. As to the "AI" voices, it's a fan project nobody should have cared; it's a tool just like Blender. I think this was released at a time where actors and writers are desperately screaming that they're irreplaceable. No one gave a shit about factory workers and miners over the past 40 years; why should we care about voice actors?
For smaller indie projects and non-profit based projects there is little justified reason for anyone to give a fuck.
I will admit though, I would not be so happy about larger companies like Google hoovering up everything about my person and profiting off of it. I mean, they already do with a lot of other data (which I've not been happy about), but hoovering up my thoughts, ideas, method of thinking, personality, writing style, my voice, etc etc. would be... a far greater degree of violation that would enrage me beyond measure.
Especially if they're hoovering this data up without me signing any kind of a contract with their service because they're just pure-data mining the entire Internet completely unrestricted (which again, they have already done with a lot of data for a while, but still, this would be a new level of low).
It's only going to get worse. Big Data powers AI.
They should be paying you for your data, but people still think handing over all of your data is just the price you have to pay for making use of 'free services'.
They'll take your data even if you pay, you have no other alternative so why should they pay you?