Pretty much as expected. Only a retard would trust LTT for accurate tech info, however one thing HN mentions I disagree with - the mouse feet thing. If a mouse really does have transparent film on its feet with no pull tabs, that is a shitty design and the manufacturer's fault if a reviewer (or user) misses them.
Eh, no pull tabs can be a valid minor negative design point in a review because an inexperienced user might miss them. But it is still a total failure of a reviewer to conduct friction testing and not even inspect the pads properly.
Pretty much as expected. Only a retard would trust LTT for accurate tech info, however one thing HN mentions I disagree with - the mouse feet thing. If a mouse really does have transparent film on its feet with no pull tabs, that is a shitty design and the manufacturer's fault if a reviewer (or user) misses them.
Eh, no pull tabs can be a valid minor negative design point in a review because an inexperienced user might miss them. But it is still a total failure of a reviewer to conduct friction testing and not even inspect the pads properly.
Yeah the reviewer is dumb but the same mistake would've been made by many people who bought it too.
And I wouldn't blame the users because it's not their job to be knowledgeable and meticulous about stuff like that.
It is the reviewer's job though, and people deserve to get shit on for taking money for a job they're too incompetent/negligent to complete correctly.
The plastic will come off in a week or so and then people will say "oh snap this mouse is good after all!"