Considering that absolute, near-impossibility of a decapitation during regular delivery and the stunningly unlikely chance of something like that accidentally occurring during a c-section, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say "reserve judgement, we don't have the full story yet", gentlemen. For all we know, the child was non-viable and/or already dead when the delivery was first attempted, and a delivery-by-parts was the least bad option once they began the c-section and got a clear look inside the mother.
Seriously.
Especially considering the parents are suing for:
the "tremendous mental and physical anguish and trauma" experienced by Ross, who was awake while the doctor was attempting to remove the baby.
Because you generally don't put a mother and infant under general anesthesia, lady; it's fucking dangerous.
also seeking to recover damages for the full value of the baby's life, including loss of earnings and loss of enjoyment of life.
AKA the gibsiest of "gibs me dat" bullshit. Baby dies, either during or before delivery, and you're suing for 'loss of earnings'? Fuck you and your gods-be-damned ambulance chasing lawyers.
Considering that absolute, near-impossibility of a decapitation during regular delivery and the stunningly unlikely chance of something like that accidentally occurring during a c-section, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say "reserve judgement, we don't have the full story yet", gentlemen. For all we know, the child was non-viable and/or already dead when the delivery was first attempted, and a delivery-by-parts was the least bad option once they began the c-section and got a clear look inside the mother.
Seriously.
Especially considering the parents are suing for:
Because you generally don't put a mother and infant under general anesthesia, lady; it's fucking dangerous.
AKA the gibsiest of "gibs me dat" bullshit. Baby dies, either during or before delivery, and you're suing for 'loss of earnings'? Fuck you and your gods-be-damned ambulance chasing lawyers.