I always said Trump should have done it this way and set tighter controls on who could enter the WH and who he spoke to, but for some reason he seems to enjoy giving interviews to people who hate him.
He should have stood his ground and said "Jim assaulted a woman- CNN isn't banned, just him for his unacceptable actions. He can apply again in 1 year and we'll re-evaluate if he's shown genuine reform of his behavior."
No, when the courts said he couldn't ban people, he should have ended press conferences entirely. There's nothing in the law saying they are required and there's no reason why a bunch of anointed priests should be allowed special privileges.
Hold press conferences online and let people vote on the questions. Journalists have to get in line like everyone else.
I always said Trump should have done it this way and set tighter controls on who could enter the WH and who he spoke to, but for some reason he seems to enjoy giving interviews to people who hate him.
He should have stood his ground and said "Jim assaulted a woman- CNN isn't banned, just him for his unacceptable actions. He can apply again in 1 year and we'll re-evaluate if he's shown genuine reform of his behavior."
No, when the courts said he couldn't ban people, he should have ended press conferences entirely. There's nothing in the law saying they are required and there's no reason why a bunch of anointed priests should be allowed special privileges.
Hold press conferences online and let people vote on the questions. Journalists have to get in line like everyone else.