I read through the comments for that tweet (via Nitter obviously) and I can only see two types of reply. The sycophant who want her to notice them and believes that anything they disagree with is abuse. Or the critic who was asking for evidence and examples of this abuse to verify the claims she is making. I didn't see any abuse, the worst you could claim is the odd sharp rebuke after their main critique.
She miswrote criticism as "online abuse" again.
Someone criticising her once per point she makes is not hate, abuse, harassment or stalking.
I read through the comments for that tweet (via Nitter obviously) and I can only see two types of reply. The sycophant who want her to notice them and believes that anything they disagree with is abuse. Or the critic who was asking for evidence and examples of this abuse to verify the claims she is making. I didn't see any abuse, the worst you could claim is the odd sharp rebuke after their main critique.