So basically they suspect this dude from 110 years ago didn't make accurate recordings, based on the fact it makes no sense for him to have recorded such wildly differing temperatures when cross-checked with the recorded temperatures in the nearby surrounding area back then and the decades since then. discredits the climate cult's beliefs.
They literally explain why it's not physically possible for the old recordings taken by this guy to be accurate.
Yes, I'm sure they all just missed this supposedly blatant flaw for 110 years and it's just a coincidence that it was being used to discredit climate catastrophism, which coincidentally is associated with a corrupt field of science which has been shown to manipulate data that tends to disprove its climate catastrophism.
FTFY
Yes, I'm sure they all just missed this supposedly blatant flaw for 110 years and it's just a coincidence that it was being used to discredit climate catastrophism, which coincidentally is associated with a corrupt field of science which has been shown to manipulate data that tends to disprove its climate catastrophism.